thenextwave

Thinking in Three Horizons

Posted in emerging issues, future, methods, strategy by thenextwavefutures on 20 November, 2008

I’ve not had much time to blog recently, but I wanted to mention the article I had published recently in the Journal of Futures Studies on the Three Horizons method (“Seeing in Multiple Horizons: Connecting Futures to Strategy” [opens pdf], August 2008, co-written with Tony Hodgson of Decision Integrity). The three horizons method connects possible futures back to the present, and by doing so helps to structure ideas about likely rates of change and the types of conflict which may occur.

I’ve been working for a couple of years with the group of futures and systems practitioners which evolved the idea – which is not the same as the McKinsey management model of the same name. Tony and Bill Sharpe did the first work on the method when they used it to think about long-term technology change for the UK government’s Foresight project on Intelligent Infrastructure Systems (as a result we also used it on that project to help test the 50-year scenarios). I like the approach because it is a way of integrating a technique which is framed by systems ideas with other futures techniques.

A couple of quotes help to explain the thinking behind the method. The first is from the great Donella Meadows:

“- In the short term, while infrastructure facilities remain in place, while pipelines under construction or materials in transit discharge their contents, while people age, while trees grow, while existing pollutants work their way out of the groundwater or the bottom mud, a great deal (but not everything) cannot be changed and therefore can be predicted.

- In the long term, almost everything can change. Infrastructure facilities may have been replaced (solar-powered? informed by whole-system thinking?). There may be a new generation of people (with new mindsets and cultures?) and trees (tightly-controlled plantations? a slow ecological return to whatever nature chooses?). Therefore, not much can be predicted, but a great deal can be chosen.

- In the middle term, there is a messy combination of predictability and choice.”

The second is from the influential systems thinker Donald Schon, from his book Beyond The Stable State:

“A social system does not move smoothly from one state of its culture to another. In processes of social transformation, societies move from a relatively stable state through a zone of disruption to a new zone of relative stability. Something old must come apart in order for something new to come together. But for individuals within the system, there is no clear grasp of the next stable state, only a clear picture of the one to be lost. Hence, the coming apart carries uncertainty and anguish for the members of the system, since it puts at risk the basis for self-identity that the system had provided”.

It’s probably worth trying to summarise the method in a couple of lines. The first horizon is the dominant present, which frames our current thinking about a domain. (In electricity supply, for example, think of centralised generation based on fossil fuels). It will decline in influence as the external environment changes. The third horizon is a possible future which may become dominant over time; in the electricity supply example, one such future is a distributed network powered by renewable energy sources. There are clues already as to what these competing futures might look like, but they are marginal and often marginalised. In between, there is the second horizon. This is a space in which the current horizon – where the power, the influence, and the money, along with connections, relationships and prestige are to be found – adapts to signals about the future: sometimes incrementally, sometimes disruptively, sometimes destructively.

I’ve now used the method in a number of workshops, mostly to test and develop scenarios (which become the third horizon ‘end-state’). Although it seems theoretically complex, people do understand it, and the discussion which shares views about the characteristics of the current first horizon are often illuminating. I also like it because it helps people keep emerging issues and weak signals of change at front of mind – they often get disregarded or overlooked in futures processes which emphasise important and uncertain drivers of change. Other members of the informal group which has developed the thinking also have good reports from their work.

The article is quite long and quite academic, but it does explain the approach well. The work’s being developed further under the aegis of the International Futures Forum in Scotland.

Update, 24/01/09: A Thousand Tomorrows has this take on the JFS Three Horizons article.

About these ads

7 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Tony Hodgson said, on 21 November, 2008 at 7:50 pm

    Hi Andrew!
    I feel something of a hiatus in my explorations of 3H. Probably the relief of just seeing it there in print. However, Graham and I used it with a group of Chief Inspectors of Schools in Scotland a few weeks back. This was with the stimulus of prepared cards to place on the horizons (based on interview and discussions) . the result is that they are exploring using this as a common language for educational transformation linked to their own emerging pro gramme of horizon scanning. It still amazes me that this frame releases permission to have otherwise difficult conversations. It seems to have an efficacy way beyond its intellectual context. However, I’m glad we’ve got some quotable underpinning for it now. I hope your readers will make their own explorationsand share those with us. Tony

  2. [...] blog posts on the three horizons model by Andrew Curry and A Thousand [...]

  3. How change happens « thenextwave said, on 30 October, 2010 at 1:08 pm

    [...] their way,  all of these map on to the Three Horizons model, which I have helped to develop, which explores how new ideas and discourses succeed (or not) in [...]

  4. [...] here. One of the tools we used to understand the rate of change of scenarios over time was the Three Horizons model – I have posted a long article I co-wrote on this to the Selected Articles page as [...]

  5. [...] they are both interesting. Instead, I mean this. I’ve written before on this blog about the Three Horizons model, originally developed by Bill Sharpe and Tony Hodgson, and which Tony and I evolved further in an [...]

  6. […] the Occupy encampments, I wrote a post drawing on the Three Horizons futures model. This suggested that Occupy was a was a Third Horizon activity, associated with visions of change […]

  7. […] when I was asked to contribute to an Association of Professional Futurists workshop that used the Three Horizons method to explore candidates for the Sixth surge, I wondered if it was possible to identify future-facing […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,132 other followers

%d bloggers like this: